<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Real: Online vs. Print Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:31:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-12348</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-12348</guid>
		<description>Online publishing is booming now and it will help in drive the readers. You can check the site www.pressmart.net which providing the digital solutions for all print publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online publishing is booming now and it will help in drive the readers. You can check the site <a href="http://www.pressmart.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.pressmart.net</a> which providing the digital solutions for all print publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-11331</link>
		<dc:creator>ken keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-11331</guid>
		<description>Jason Makansi is right about contests. The fees they charge pays for the prizes and more. Reading fees should be paid to the authors for allowing editors to read the work. Like an architect&#039;s design or an artist&#039;s sketch. Reputable agents should be paid on commission only. It&#039;s up to us to make this the norm by not paying money out without money coming in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Makansi is right about contests. The fees they charge pays for the prizes and more. Reading fees should be paid to the authors for allowing editors to read the work. Like an architect&#8217;s design or an artist&#8217;s sketch. Reputable agents should be paid on commission only. It&#8217;s up to us to make this the norm by not paying money out without money coming in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Makansi</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10759</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Makansi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10759</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t my paying &quot;day&quot; job so I don&#039;t really care about getting paid for a story. It&#039;s nice when it happens but it&#039;s never going to pay any real bills for me. As for contests, I never enter and I consider them generally close to fraudulent if they don&#039;t give you anything back, such as at least some commentary about the work submitted. A reading fee should also be a payment for something, such as why the rejection, not just a formal rejection slip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t my paying &#8220;day&#8221; job so I don&#8217;t really care about getting paid for a story. It&#8217;s nice when it happens but it&#8217;s never going to pay any real bills for me. As for contests, I never enter and I consider them generally close to fraudulent if they don&#8217;t give you anything back, such as at least some commentary about the work submitted. A reading fee should also be a payment for something, such as why the rejection, not just a formal rejection slip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10199</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10199</guid>
		<description>As a writer who is at this point only interested in online publication, I really have to take exception to the idea that online writing is &quot;for writers.&quot; 

In my experience butting heads against what I&#039;ll call &quot;entry level&quot; print published authors, my experience is quite the opposite... many of them are more concerned with what other writers and people in the industry think and are utterly disconnected from their audience.

Online authors, on the other hand, have a direct and immediate link to their readers. The readership is involved, invested.

I think the idea that people under 24 don&#039;t read comes from a tendency to discount online reading. People read blogs online. They read news online. They read fan fiction online. Obviously there is no inherent bias or barrier that would prevent them from reading original literary works online.

I write online and my writing reaches thousands of people in a day. I reap a modest living on the fruits of my writing in an age when all I hear about is how hard it is to make a living as an author and the publishing industry is bringing diminishing returns. I get the cachet, the prestige of having your name &quot;in print&quot; and thinking &quot;Somebody thought enough of my story to do this.&quot;... but I don&#039;t see the advantages of print as being an equal trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a writer who is at this point only interested in online publication, I really have to take exception to the idea that online writing is &#8220;for writers.&#8221; </p>
<p>In my experience butting heads against what I&#8217;ll call &#8220;entry level&#8221; print published authors, my experience is quite the opposite&#8230; many of them are more concerned with what other writers and people in the industry think and are utterly disconnected from their audience.</p>
<p>Online authors, on the other hand, have a direct and immediate link to their readers. The readership is involved, invested.</p>
<p>I think the idea that people under 24 don&#8217;t read comes from a tendency to discount online reading. People read blogs online. They read news online. They read fan fiction online. Obviously there is no inherent bias or barrier that would prevent them from reading original literary works online.</p>
<p>I write online and my writing reaches thousands of people in a day. I reap a modest living on the fruits of my writing in an age when all I hear about is how hard it is to make a living as an author and the publishing industry is bringing diminishing returns. I get the cachet, the prestige of having your name &#8220;in print&#8221; and thinking &#8220;Somebody thought enough of my story to do this.&#8221;&#8230; but I don&#8217;t see the advantages of print as being an equal trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10147</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10147</guid>
		<description>Great post! 

As a struggling writer, I find online publishing easier to gain more readers. Dabbling on sites like storymash has been a new treat for me, and if you haven&#039;t heard of it, you should check it out.

However, as an avid reader, I just can&#039;t see online replacing the comfortable pages of a print novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! </p>
<p>As a struggling writer, I find online publishing easier to gain more readers. Dabbling on sites like storymash has been a new treat for me, and if you haven&#8217;t heard of it, you should check it out.</p>
<p>However, as an avid reader, I just can&#8217;t see online replacing the comfortable pages of a print novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10131</link>
		<dc:creator>ken keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10131</guid>
		<description>Hello to all you fantastic readers! What a great audience! Yeah, I&#039;m just jiving but I really do enjoy this back and forth from interested folks of literature. As an artist and writer, it&#039;s apparent that we are heading toward a new and unexplored frontier and getting our works out to the public is the main priority. Any form of communication needs an outlet. The more options, the greater chance of connecting. I exhibit my art in galleries and online. I have published in print and online. There are different audiences to address and the fact is that any way to &quot;get it out there&quot; is good. The music industry was split wide open when the Beatles came on the scene because they were able to call the shots because of their popularity and thus, they had the power. Great music was created during that period because of independent music publishers. Now, the same thing is occuring because writers and artists and musicians are able to let the public decide their own tastes. A surfer friend of mine would sum it up easily. &quot;Dude, it&#039;s all good!&quot; I would have to agree. Read on, oh mighty readers! Read on! (Write on, too)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello to all you fantastic readers! What a great audience! Yeah, I&#8217;m just jiving but I really do enjoy this back and forth from interested folks of literature. As an artist and writer, it&#8217;s apparent that we are heading toward a new and unexplored frontier and getting our works out to the public is the main priority. Any form of communication needs an outlet. The more options, the greater chance of connecting. I exhibit my art in galleries and online. I have published in print and online. There are different audiences to address and the fact is that any way to &#8220;get it out there&#8221; is good. The music industry was split wide open when the Beatles came on the scene because they were able to call the shots because of their popularity and thus, they had the power. Great music was created during that period because of independent music publishers. Now, the same thing is occuring because writers and artists and musicians are able to let the public decide their own tastes. A surfer friend of mine would sum it up easily. &#8220;Dude, it&#8217;s all good!&#8221; I would have to agree. Read on, oh mighty readers! Read on! (Write on, too)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10106</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10106</guid>
		<description>Fascinating post, I&#039;m kinda surprised at seeing such a love for online - it definitely shows that the publishing tide is turning and it now takes more than simply being printed to be considered a desirable place to be published. Quality over form - great stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating post, I&#8217;m kinda surprised at seeing such a love for online &#8211; it definitely shows that the publishing tide is turning and it now takes more than simply being printed to be considered a desirable place to be published. Quality over form &#8211; great stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10100</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10100</guid>
		<description>Really, Dave?! That&#039;s encouraging. I&#039;ve never heard of anyone reading lit mags, online or otherwise. Very cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, Dave?! That&#8217;s encouraging. I&#8217;ve never heard of anyone reading lit mags, online or otherwise. Very cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10095</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10095</guid>
		<description>I was kinda surprised by V&#039;s response about nobody but writers reading online lit mags, while stating that some non-writers read print lit mags. I wonder if that&#039;s a cultural difference across the pond. Among my friends, I know one non-writer who used to subscribe to Zoetrope, but doesn&#039;t anymore. That&#039;s it as far as non-writing print readers goes. Online? Totally different story. A fairly large number of my non-writing friends read online mags. One example I can think of off the top of my head: I&#039;m a frequent reader of a blog devoted to the Seattle Mariners, and I&#039;ve several times seen the comments among readers of that blog veer off into discussions of stories they read in McSweeney&#039;s online. There&#039;re probably a dozen guys there who, if we&#039;re going based on stereotypes of avid sports fans, we wouldn&#039;t think were reading lit mags at all. And yet, there they are. And I know they&#039;re not unique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was kinda surprised by V&#8217;s response about nobody but writers reading online lit mags, while stating that some non-writers read print lit mags. I wonder if that&#8217;s a cultural difference across the pond. Among my friends, I know one non-writer who used to subscribe to Zoetrope, but doesn&#8217;t anymore. That&#8217;s it as far as non-writing print readers goes. Online? Totally different story. A fairly large number of my non-writing friends read online mags. One example I can think of off the top of my head: I&#8217;m a frequent reader of a blog devoted to the Seattle Mariners, and I&#8217;ve several times seen the comments among readers of that blog veer off into discussions of stories they read in McSweeney&#8217;s online. There&#8217;re probably a dozen guys there who, if we&#8217;re going based on stereotypes of avid sports fans, we wouldn&#8217;t think were reading lit mags at all. And yet, there they are. And I know they&#8217;re not unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-10080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyspitzer.com/2008/01/23/get-real-online-vs-print-publishing/#comment-10080</guid>
		<description>Publishing over the internet, RSS, pod cast is the emerging trend and all publishers should digitize their publications in order to increase their circulations. There is a website www.pressmart.net providing above services (digital services) for all print publications. Publishers can be benefited by using these kinds of services in order to increase their circulations as well as revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishing over the internet, RSS, pod cast is the emerging trend and all publishers should digitize their publications in order to increase their circulations. There is a website <a href="http://www.pressmart.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.pressmart.net</a> providing above services (digital services) for all print publications. Publishers can be benefited by using these kinds of services in order to increase their circulations as well as revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
